Saturday, February 18, 2012

CARE Model: Planning Tool


Tool 8.1 CARE Model: Planning Tool



Identify Concerns that must change (look to the future)

(Assign points to concerns from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important issues to consider.)

1.  Do we have effective consequences for students that have been assigned Academic Intervention?  Are the consequences severe enough to deter the “chronic” offenders?

2.  Are teachers consistently following the criteria established for assigning a student to Academic Intervention?

3.  Is the data generated from the Academic Intervention Program being collected and disbursed in a consistent and useful manner to teachers and administrators?



Identify Affirmations that must be sustained (look to the present)

(Assign points to affirmations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important issues to consider.)

1.  Teachers must retain a workable and effective (non-class time) method of addressing students with missing assignments, low test scores, and time to work with those students who need one-on-one tutoring.

2.  Students must continue to have avenues outside of the class day to work on academic deficiencies to meet guidelines specified in the campus improvement guidelines.

3.  The campus principal must continue to monitor the results from the Academic Intervention Program and evaluate it effectiveness and timeliness.



SMART Recommendations that must be implemented:

(Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely)

(Assign points to recommendations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important recommendations to implement.)

1.  Design and circulate a teacher survey specifically formulated to get the most critical teacher feedback regarding their feelings about the program.

2.  Design and circulated a student survey to gather feedback as to their point of view and feelings about the program.

3.  Tabulate and analyze the data to assess the most important concerns of the teachers and students regarding all aspects of the program.



EVALUATE – Specifically and Often

(Identify the best ways to evaluate the implemented recommendations.)

1.  Use the Delphi Method as a tool to understand the true effectiveness of the program

2.  Analyze data from the initial teacher and student surveys, summarize the information, provide a rationale for the answers, and resubmit a revised survey for further input.

3.  Continue the process until the group settles on a method for modifying or eliminating the program in favor of another.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Action Research Plan


                                                ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT



                                                       PROCESS OVERVIEW



                     TOPIC:  Is the Academic Interventions Program at SISD effective?



  1. SETTING THE FOUNDATION

Students at SJHS that fall behind or underperform in their core classes are assigned to “Academic Intervention.”  This is an after school program designed to help students catch up on missing work and receive one on one tutorials by the teacher who assigned them.  The student is required to attend 30 minutes of tutorials after school on Tuesday and Thursday each week until released.



  1. ANALYZING DATA

The Director of the Academic Intervention Program keeps detailed records of students assigned to the program. We will collect and analyze the totality of the data looking for any obvious patterns or conclusions supported by the data.



  1. DEVELOPING DEEPER UNDERSTANDING

Additional data will be collected via teacher interviews and a teacher survey (developed by the intern) in an effort to gather greater insight into the numbers revealed by the data.



  1. ENGAGING IN SELF-REFLECTION

Reflecting on the overall effectiveness of the program and discussion with the site supervisor, program director, and teachers to determine if the program should be continued, modified, or eliminated.



  1. EXPLORING PROGRAMMATIC PATTERNS

The data will be carefully analyzed to see if the data identifies patterns, gaps, and equity issues. The site supervisor, program director and the intern will perform the analysis and share the results with the core teachers, asking for further input from those teachers.



  1. DETERMINING DIRECTION

Looking at the current results of the program should answer the question posed: Does the program improve scores and overall student performance? If it is determined the program needs modification or elimination the panel will research other Academic Intervention programs to evaluate what modifications would improve the program, or what similar programs are being used by other districts that are successful.



  1. TAKING ACTION FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT

After analyzing the data, utilizing teacher input, and researching available alternatives the results will be presented to the faculty for discussion on the appropriate action to be taken.



  1. SUSTAINING IMPROVEMENT

To ensure improvement in this area the campus principal, program director, and teachers will evaluate the revised program as to its effectiveness and success over an agreed upon period (possibly the fall 2012 semester) to see the results. The panel will set improvement goals and periodic points to re-evaluate the program.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Lots of great insights in week 2 lesson. The Dana text reading was very informative. The concept of "principal-inquirer" and  "wondering" and the use of action research in the ninepassion areas provides an effective approach to becoming a more informed and effective administrator.

I enjoyed listening to the videos...hearing what experienced administrators had to say about the use of research, data-driven decision making, etc.